Indissoluble Weave: Unraveling the Alleged Conflict between Imagination and Reasonimagination; reason; creativity; cognitive faculties; infinity.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the overcoming of the reason v. imagination dichotomy in light of existential infinity. It argues that such separations are fallacious constructs, as both faculties operate in an interconnected manner, recombining elements of the effective – commonly known as the “real”. It attempts to demonstrate that, from the most basic physiological level to the most advanced philosophical one, imagination and reason form a cognitive continuum, sharing both the most primitive neural and neurochemical substrates and the most ethereal and advanced procedural stages of high-performance thought. Creativity emerges as the highest expression of this integration, contrasting with the limitations of artificial intelligence systems, which merely recombine data without effective intentionality. It concludes by highlighting the need for an epistemological maturity that values the intertwined nature of these capacities, avoiding both excessive demands and reductive underestimations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.
References
ANDERSON, M. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Agosto, 33 (4), pp. 245–246, 2010.
ANDREWS-HANNA, J. et al. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 1316, n. 1, p. 29–52, 2014.
ARENDT, H. A vida do espírito: o pensar, o querer, o julgar. Trad. de Antônio Abranches. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará, 2000.
BARGMANN, C. Beyond the connectome: how neuromodulators shape neural circuits. Bioessays, junho, 34, (6), pp. 458–65, 2012.
BAUDELAIRE, C. O pintor da vida moderna. Trad. de Tomaz Tadeu. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2010.
BEATY, R. et al. Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, 2015.
BEATY, R. et al. Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Procedings of National. Academy of Sciences, 115 (5), pp. 1087–1092, 2018.
BENGIO, Y. Deep learning for AI: challenges and opportunities. Communications of the ACM, v. 64, n. 6, p. 58–65, 2021.
BUTLER, J. Notas para uma teoria performativa de assembleia. Trad. de Marina Vargas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2018.
BUTLER, O. E. Kindred: laços de sangue. Trad. de Carolina Caires Coelho. São Paulo: Morro Branco, 2019.
CHRISTOFF, K.; Irving, Z.; FOX, K.; Spreng R.; Andrews-Hanna, J. Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, novembro, 17 (11), pp. 718–731, 2016.
DAYAN, P. Twenty-five lessons from computational neuromodulation. Neuron, outubro, 4, 76 (1), pp. 240–56, 2016.
FOUCAULT, M. As palavras e as coisas: uma arqueologia das ciências humanas. Trad. de Salma Tannus Muchail. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
KANT, I. Crítica da razão pura. Trad. de Valerio Rohden e Udo Baldur Moosburger. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1980 (Coleção “Os Pensadores”).
KANT, I. Crítica da faculdade do juízo. Trad. de Valerio Rohden e António Marques. São Paulo: Forense Universitária, 1993.
MARDER, E. Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits: back to the future. Neuron, outubro, 4, 76, (1), pp. 1-11, 2012.
MARX, K. O capital: crítica da economia política. Trad. de Reginaldo Sant’Anna. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2008.
MENON, V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci, outubro, 15 (10), pp. 483-506, 2011.
MOHR, H. Et al. Integration and segregation of large-scale brain networks during short-term task automatization. Nature Communication, 7, 13217, 2016.
NIETZSCHE, F. Além do bem e do mal. Trad. de Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. 2012.
POLDRACK, R. et al. The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. The Journal of Neuroscience, junho, 1, 25 (22), pp. 5356–5364, 2005.
SARA, S. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, março, 10, (3), pp. 211–223, 2009.
SHAVIRO, S. The universe of things: on speculative realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
SCHULTZ, W. Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, março, 17, (3), pp. 183–95, 2016.
ZABELINA, D.; ANDREWS-HANNA, J. Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, v. 40, p. 86–93, 2016.
ZHUANG, K. et al. Diverse functional interaction driven by control-default network hubs supports creative thinking. Cerebral Cortex, v. 33, n. 23, pp. 11206–11224, 2023.