Aesthetics and art criticism in Jean-François Lyotard
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the relationship between aesthetics and art criticism in Jean-François Lyotard. It shows that in the comments to the works of Barnett Newman, Arakawa; Adami; Daniel Buren and Karel Appel, among others, the author affirms the possibility of an "aesthetics of the material presence". It points out that the criticism of the works of these artists allowed Lyotard to advance in his critique of representation, inasmuch as the works of these artists would show in the immanence of the pictorial form that the essential of painting is not the expression of the subject nor the naming of the object, but the "invocation of the material presence". Faced with the works of these artists the artist would be asked: "Will something happen?" We also show that in this characterization of art as "presentification of the impresentiable," the author singularly mobilised the sense of the sublime in Edmund Burke, Immanuel Kant, and Friedrich Schiller. We also see that Lyotard conceived in his art criticism different levels of tension between the "art of presence" and the "work of memory" performed in the artistic form, calling the latter one of perlaboration (durcharbeiten) - as in the "dialectics of material" in Theodor Adorno. Finally, we emphasize that the works commented on by Lyotard can not be subsumed by the paradigm of communication, as its participants would experience in the experience of the indeterminacy of language the "community of a lack", thus rising against the "exorbitant beauty "In the society of technoscience.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.