Ethics of the impossible: a reflection from deconstruction
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article intends to present another reading about ethical issues - hospitality, reception justice - from the perspective of the impossible: an ethics of the impossible. Through an interpretative analysis of some of Jacques Derrida’s works, the perspective of the Ethics of the impossible, presented here, pass through the questioning of such an absence that allows the other to remain inaccessible or, as a condition of im/possibility of the relationship with the other, also referred to as ‘an unrelated relationship’ beyond the present or mere appearance. Thus, the possibility of a full presence is questioned. It is warned that this thought does not deny the presence of the other, but questions the supremacy given to the presence in the philosophical tradition, to the absence’s detriment. Likewise, it is not intended an inversion of terms - absence in supremacy of presence - but an alternation of terms, a play between absence and presence in acting in front of the other. The responsibility towards the other, not as imposition or force, but as openness and acceptance and host to every other time. Each time another, because it transcends the present time for time to come, always to come, a disjunction of time between that which is absent and presents itself without totalizing in advance.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.