On Quine’s reasons for holophrastic indeterminacy of translation

Article Sidebar

Capa do número 48 da revista O que nos faz pensar
PDF (Português (Brasil))
Published: Jun 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32334/oqnfp.2021n48a711
Keywords:
Quine, indeterminacy of translation, holophrastic indeterminacy, underdetermination

Main Article Content

Rogério Passos Severo
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-4706
Guilherme Gräf Schüler
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-0646

Abstract

A common assumption about Quine’s indeterminacy of holophrastic translation is that his main reason for it was his thesis of underdetermination of theories by observations. Quine in fact made that argument. Yet, his mature formulation of the thesis of underdetermination rendered that argument invalid, and he subsequently dropped it. This paper explains that shift in Quine’s thought and indicates his mature reasons for indeterminacy of holophrastic translation.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 29 No. 48 (2021): No. 48: June 2021
Section
Articles

Copyright Notice

The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.

Author Biographies

Rogério Passos Severo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Professor adjunto no Dept. de Filosofia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. PhD em filosofia pela University of Illinois at Chicago. Atua nas áreas de filosofia da ciência, teoria do conhecimento, filosofia da linguagem, metafísica e filosofia da religião.

Guilherme Gräf Schüler, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Possui graduação em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2017-2021). Tem experiência na área de Filosofia, com ênfase em Filosofia da Ciência e Epistemologia Contemporânea. É graduando em Ciência da Computação pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul 

References

ALLEN, S. Can theoretical underdetermination support the indeterminacy of translation? Revisiting Quine’s ‘real ground’. Philosophy, v. 85, p. 67-90, 2010.
DUMMETT, M. Frege: philosophy of language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981 [1ªt ed. 1973].
HUMPHRIES, B. Indeterminacy of translation and theory. Journal of Philosophy, v. 67, n. 6, p. 167-178, 1970.
HYLTON, P. Quine. New York: Routledge, 2007.
IIDA, T. Professor Quine on Japanese classifiers. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, v. 9, n. 3, p. 111-118, 1998.
KHANI, A. Quine on the indeterminacy of translation: a dilemma for Davidson. Dialectica, v. 72, p. 101-120, 2018.
KIRK, R. More on Quine’s reasons for indeterminacy of translation. Analysis, v. 37, p. 136-141, 1977.
KIRK, R. Indeterminacy of translation. In: The Cambridge Companion to Quine, ed. by R. Gibson Jr., 151–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
MILLER, A. Meaning scepticism. In: The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by M. Devitt and R. Hanley, p. 191-213. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2004 .
QUINE, W. V. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1960.
QUINE, W. V. Ontological relativity. In: QUINE, W. V. Ontological relativity and other essays, p. 26-68. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
QUINE, W. V. On the reasons the indeterminacy of translation. Journal of Philosophy, v. 67, p. 178-183, 1970.
QUINE, W. V. The roots of reference. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1973.
QUINE, W. V. On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis, v. 9, p. 313-328, 1975a.
QUINE, W. V. The nature of natural knowledge. In: Mind and language, ed. by S. Guttenplan, p. 76-81. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975b.
QUINE, W. V. Personal letter to Robert Kirk, dated 13 September 1976. In: W. V. Quine papers. MS Am 2587 (592). Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
QUINE, W. V. Comments on Newton-Smith. Analysis, v. 39, p. 66-67, 1979.
QUINE, W. V. Theories and things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
QUINE, W. V. Reply to Paul A. Roth. In: The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, ed. by E. H. Hahn & P. A. Schilpp, p. 459-461, 2a ed. exp., 1998. Chicago: Open Court, 1986a.
QUINE, W. V. Reply to John Woods. In: The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, ed. by E. H. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp, p. 726-728. 2a ed. exp., 1998. Chicago: Open Court, 1986b.
QUINE, W. V. Indeterminacy of translation again. Journal of Philosophy, v. 87, p. 5-10, 1987.
QUINE, W. V. Three indeterminacies. In: Perspectives on Quine, ed. R. Barrett and R. Gibson Jr., p. 1-16. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.
QUINE, W. V. Pursuit of Truth. 2ª ed. rev. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.
ROTH, P. Semantics without foundations. In: The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, ed. by E. H. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp, p. 433-458. 2a ed. exp., 1998. Chicago: Open Court, 1986.
SEVERO, R. ‘Plausible insofar as it is intelligible’: Quine on underdetermination. Synthese, v. 161, p. 141-165, 2008.
SOAMES, S. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century – Volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.