Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This text is the translation of an article by Bruno Latour originally published in 2004, in which, in the face of the recent wave of mistrust of scientific facts, almost instant revisionism and conspiracy theories of all kinds, he defends the need for a redefinition of critical instruments in the field of science studies. Revisiting his previous analysis of the way in which much of the human sciences, inspired by social criticism, arbitrarily alternate between the fact and the fairy positions to explain their objects, sometimes considering human actions as determined by social or natural laws, sometimes giving all symbolic power to humans and declaring them fetishists, the author argues that it is necessary to replace matters of fact with matters of concern and return to what William James called a “stubbornly realistic attitude”: not to move away from facts, but to get even closer to them; not to deconstruct or to strip facts of their strength, but to add even more reality to them.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.