Beyond dialectic: between logos and the sacred
Main Article Content
Abstract
My purpose here is to analyze how dialectic, expressed by Plato on his Dialogues, emerged from an inherent link between mythical and rational levels. In the first section, I’ll aim to expose the rise of the conception of theoría, as a religious and a political practice, observed mainly in the birth of tragedy as a civic and ritual phenomenon, pre-condition to philosophy’s awakening. In the second section, I’ll discuss that the platonic reproach of tragedy and epic poetry isn’t based on an aesthetic critic, but on a phenomenology of passions, by which he defends his ontological and ethical approach against poets and tragic mentality. Hence, platonic dialectic arises from an attempt to elaborate a new form of worldview of mythical and rational structures, attested at in the Athenian polis. In the last section, I’ll intend to demonstrate that dialectic has on Plato’s Dialogues an ambiguous meaning, because it can also indicate science of truth and the right side of rhetoric. According to these assumptions (above) mentioned, I’ll expect to confirm the polysemic sense of dialectic, conceived as a project at the same time rhetorical and epistemic, political and cultural.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.
References
CASSIN, Barbara. O Efeito sofístico. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2005.
COLLI, Giorgio. La Sagesse Grecque. Tome III. Héraclite. Trad. Marie José Tramuta. Paris: Editions l’Éclat, 1994.
DIXSAUT, Monique. Platon, le désir de comprendre. Paris: Jean Vrin, 2003.
GADAMER, Hans George. Verdade e Método. Vol. 1. São Paulo: Vozes, 2007.
GOURINAT, Michel. “La diérèse est-elle une partie de la dialectique?” IN GOURINAT, J.B. et LEMAIRE, J. (ÉD.). Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité. Paris: Jean Vrin, 2016.
GUTHRIE, W.K.C. The Sophists. Cambridge: CUP, 1971.
HAVELOCK, Eric. Preface to Plato. Harvard University Press: 1963.
HAVELOCK, Eric. A revolução da escrita na Grécia antiga. Tradução de Ordep Serra. São Paulo: UNESP, 1994.
MATTÉI, Jean François. Platon et le miroir du mythe, De l’âge d’or à l’Atlantide. Paris: PUF, 1996.
NIGHTINGALE, Andreas Wilson. Spectacles of truth in classical greek philosophy, theoria in its cultural context. Cambridge: C.U.P., 2009.
PLATON. La République I-III. Texte établi et traduit par Émile Chambry. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1989.
PLATON. Phèdre. Texte établi et traduit par Léon Robin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1954.
ROSEN, Stanley. Plato’s Sophist, The Drama of Original and Image. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1983.
RYLE, Gilbert. L’itinéraire de Platon. (Trad.) Jacques Follon. Paris: Jean Vrin, 2003.
TORRANO, JAA. Mito e imagens míticas. São Paulo: Editora Córrego, 2019.
TRINDADE, José. Saber e Formas: estudo de filosofia no Êutifron de Platão. Lisboa: Editorial Presença, 1987.
VASILIU, Anca. Dire et voir, la parole visible du Sophiste. Paris: Jean Vrin, 2008.
WOLFF, Francis. “Pourquoi la dialectique” in GOURINAT, J.B. & LEMAIRE, J. (ÉD.). Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité. Paris: Jean Vrin, 2016.