The aesthetical joy: Schopenhauer between the said and the unsaid Português
Main Article Content
Abstract
Schopenhauer’s Aesthetics, or better saying, Metaphysics of the Beautiful, is well known for the strange assertion according to which aesthetical joy is to be understood and even possible solely under the condition of a state of contemplation exempt from will. Besides the fact that it means a kind of feeling absolutely intellectual, surprisingly, it is still an event by which a mere instrument of knowledge is supposed to overcome its master – the will – in a way that it is able to be free for knowing objects supposedly with no interest at all to the will. This paper may challenge this theory for the sake of making sense to what Schopenhauer would mean by that.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.
References
CACCIOLA, M. L. A questão do dogmatismo. São Paulo: USP, 1994.
CACCIOLA, M. L. O conceito de interesse. Cadernos de filosofia alemã, São Paulo, n. 5, p. 5-15, ago. 1999.
MORAES, D. Desinteresse e comprazimento estético: considerações acerca da apreciação estética kantiana por Schopenhauer face às de Hegel e Heidegger. O que nos faz pensar, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, n. 28, p. 145-167, dec. 2010. Disponível em:
OUPNEK'HAT. In: DUPERRON, A. Theologia et filosofia indica. Tomus II. Paris: Argentorati, 1802.
ROSSET, C. La estética de Schopenhauer. In: ______. Escritos sobre Schopenhauer. Trad. Rafael del Hierro Oliva. Valencia: Pre-textos, 2005. p. 119-199.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Metaphysik des Schönen. Ed. Volker Spierling. Munique: Piper, 1985.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Schopenhauer im Kontext: Werkausgabe I. Berlin: Karsten Worm InfoSoftWare, 2001. 1 CD-ROM.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Metafísica do belo. Trad. anot. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: UNESP, 2003.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Aforismos para a sabedoria de vida. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: M. Fontes, 2009.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Sobre filosofia e ciência da natureza. In: ______. Sobre a filosofia e seu método. Trad. Flamarion C. Ramos. São Paulo: Hedra, 2013. p. 149-234.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e representação: tomo II – Complementos: Livros I-II. Trad. Eduardo Ribeiro da Fonseca. Curitiba: UFPR, 2014a.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e representação: tomo II – Complementos: Livros III-IV. Trad. Eduardo Ribeiro da Fonseca. Curitiba: UFPR, 2014b.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e como representação: primeiro tomo. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: UNESP, 2015a.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e como representação: segundo tomo. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: UNESP, 2015b.