Thermodynamics as Metaphor
Main Article Content
Abstract
Under consideration here is the hypothesis that the steam engine and thermodynamics in general provide a fecund metaphor and epistemological model from the Enlightenment on to the Romantics. This polarized model’s antagonism, characterised by a contrast between hot and cold poles, inherently determines its movement. Denis Diderot, for one, sees the human being as an unstable equilibrium between the reception of sensory impressions (from outside in) and the decision-making that determines its actions (from inside out). While humans of feeling are characterized by the prevalence of the first movement, akin to billowing gusts of heat, humans of reason and of will are led by the second, chilled by the effect of sustained labour. According to Diderot, the great actor is a paradoxical being who can perform heated sentiments coolly, without feeling any of their residual effects. Following this model, society and nature are worked by tensions that generate a becoming and that are incorporated into history. This conflict can be situated between races, nations, or classes. Such is already manifested, in the late 18th century, the onset of an aesthetics of the sublime and of a dialectical logic.
Translated by Déborah Spatz and revised by Clara castro.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.
References
BERCEGOL, F.; GENAND, S.; LOTTERIE; F. (org.). Une période sans nom: les années 1780-1820 et la fabrique de l’histoire littéraire. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2016.
CERRUTTI, G. Le paradoxe sur le comédien et le paradoxe sur le libertin. Diderot et Sade. Revue des sciences humaines, v.37, n.146, p. 235-251, abr.-jun. 1972.
COLLOT, M. L’Horizon fabuleux. Paris: José Corti, 1988.
DELON, M. L'idée d'énergie au tournant des Lumières: 1770-1820. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.
DELON, M. Eine Epoche im Umbruch. Die Idee der Energie in der französischen Spätaufklärung (1770–1820). Aus dem Französischen von Heinz Thoma, Leiden: Brill, col. “Laboratorium Aufklärung”, 2022.
DIDEROT, D. Éléments de physiologie. In: DIDEROT, D. Œuvres complètes / Diderot. Ed. de Jean Varloot, Michel Delon, Georges Dulac e Jean Mayer. Paris: Hermann, 1987, t. 17.
DIDEROT, D. Le rêve de d'Alembert. In: DIDEROT, D. Œuvres complètes / Diderot. Ed. de Jean Varloot, Michel Delon, Georges Dulac e Jean Mayer. Paris: Hermann, 1987, t. 17.
DIDEROT, D. Paradoxo sobre o comediante. In: DIDEROT, D. Diderot: Obras II (estética, poética e contos). Ed. e trad. de J. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2000.
DIDEROT, D. Réfutation suivie de l'ouvrage d'Helvétius intitulé L'homme. In: DIDEROT, D. Œuvres complètes / Diderot. Ed. de Jean Th. de Booy, Roland Desné, Georges Dulac [et al.]. Paris: Hermann, 2004, t. 24.
SPAVIN, R. Les Climats du pouvoir: rhétorique et politique chez Bodin, Montesquieu et Rousseau. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2018.
VERNIÈRE, P. Du Paradoxe sur le comédien au paradoxe de l’homme. In: Approches des Lumières: mélanges offerts à Jean Fabre. Paris: Klincksieck, 1974.
VERNIÈRE, P. Lumières ou clair-obscur?: trente essais sur Diderot et quelques autres. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.