The Body and Its Historical Ambivalence in Dialectic of Enlightenment by Adorno and Horkheimer

Main Article Content

Verlaine Freitas

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of affective ambiguity regarding the body as conceived in Dialectic of Enlightenment by Adorno and Horkheimer. The idea of love-hate toward the body is interpreted within the horizon of a historical dialectic marked by a strong ambivalence in personal identity, in the bond between intellect and body. We aim to develop the argument in support of the hypothesis that the sexual image in mass culture is also an index of a love-hate relationship with the body, drawing on the concept of catharsis.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Verlaine Freitas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)

He holds a bachelor’s degree (1994), a master’s degree (1996), and a Ph.D. (2001) in Philosophy from the Federal University of Minas Gerais; he completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Windsor, Canada (2011). He is currently a Full Professor at UFMG and a researcher at CNPq. He is the author of the books *Refractions: Essays on Adorno’s Aesthetics* and *Adorno and Contemporary Art*, as well as the editor of other works on aesthetics. He has translated texts by German and English-language authors, the most notable being the books *Essays on Social Psychology and Psychoanalysis* and *Early Philosophical Writings*, both containing texts by Theodor Adorno. His work focuses primarily on the themes of aesthetics, psychoanalysis, and mass culture, drawing on the works of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, and Theodor Adorno.

References

ADORNO, T. W. Ästhetische Theorie. Gesammelte Schriften, vol.7, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.

ADORNO, T. W. & HORKHEIMER, M. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. In: ADORNO, T. W. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 3. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.

ARISTÓTELES. Poética. Tradução de Eudoro de Souza. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984.

BAUDRILLARD, J. La société de consommation. Ses mythes, ses structures. Paris: Denoël, 1970.

BEAUVOIR, S. Le deuxième sexe. I Les faits et les mythes. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1976.

BENJAMIN, W. Über den Begriff der Geschichte. In: Gesammelte Schriften, vol., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.

BORGES, T F. Interesse pelo corpo na Dialética do esclarecimento de Theodor W. Adorno e Max Horkheimer. Dissertação. 2010.

DAVIS, M. The Poetry of Philosophy. On Aristotle’s Poetics. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 1992.

DUARTE, R. Mimesis e racionalidade. Belo Horizonte: Loyola, 1985.

DUARTE, R. Indústria cultural. Uma introdução. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2010.

FREUD, S. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. In: Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1999.

GRUBER, A. Leiblichkeit und Triebbegriff. Zum Schicksal des Körpers im poststrukturalistischen Dekonstruktivismus. In: KIRCHHOFF, C & SEHRIEDER, F. (Org.) Freud und Adorno. Zur Urgeschichte der Moderne. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, pp.63-90, 2005 .

JAY, M. Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.

KIEPFER, D. Individualität nach Adorno. Tübingen: Francke, 1998.

LAPLANCHE, Jean. Vida e morte em psicanálise. Cleonice Paes Barreto Mourão e Consuelo Fortes Santiago. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1985.

LAPLANCHE, Jean. O filogenético. In: _____. Novos fundamentos para a psicanálise. Tradução de Cláudia Berliner. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, pp.32-41, 1992, .

LEE, L. Y. Dialectics of the Body. Corporeality in the Philosophy of T.W Adorno. New York & London: Routledge, 2005.

SCHULTZE, L. Körperlichkeit bei Adorno. Eine Bestimmung anhand des Begriffs der Selbsterhaltung. Soziologiemagazin, v.12, n.2, p. 38-55, 2023.