Entre um “pensamento objetivado” e uma “racionalidade sem sujeito”: espírito e natureza no estruturalismo levistraussiano

Rafael Henrique Teixeira; José Francisco Miguel Henriques Bairrão

doi:10.32334/oqnfp.2025n57a1064

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published: Dec 30, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32334/oqnfp.2025n57a1064

Keywords:

Lévi-Strauss, anthropological theory, myth, subject

Rafael Henrique Teixeira

Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1925-3441

José Francisco Miguel Henriques Bairrão

Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-8873

Abstract

This article examines the structural analysis of myths as undertaken by Claude Lévi-Strauss, its relevance to the formulation of his notion of spirit, and how the anthropologist ventured some conceptual generalizations regarding nature. Such aims entail considering Lévi-Straussian structuralism—according to the justification provided by its own creator—from a perspective that subsumes, without denying it, the empirical vocation of anthropology under epistemological speculations. These speculations are discernible in his reflections on the relations between nature and spirit, as well as on the status of the subject in the consolidation of the structuralist project of comparative analysis of Amerindian mythology.

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 57 (2025): Beyond Dualism: Configurations of the Body in Modernity

Section

Other Themes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

The author of the article or book reviews submitted and approved for publication authorizes the editors to reproduce it and publish it in the journal O que nos faz pensar, with the terms “reproduction” and “publication” being understood in accordance with the definitions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The article or book reviews may be accessed both via the World Wide Web – Internet (WWW – Internet), and in printed form, its being permitted, free of charge, to consult and reproduce the text for the personal use of whoever consults it. This authorization of publication has no time limit, with the editors of the journal O que nos faz pensar being responsible for maintaining the identification of the author of the article.

Author Biographies

Rafael Henrique Teixeira, Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Possui graduação em Ciências Sociais pela USP, mestrado em Antropologia Social pela USP (CNPq), doutorado em Filosofia pela UFSCAR (FAPESP), com estágio de pesquisa na Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès (BEPE-FAPESP), e doutorado em Psicologia pela USP. Realizou pesquisa de pós-doutorado junto ao Departamento de Filosofia da UNICAMP (FAPESP), ocasião na qual desenvolveu estágio de pesquisa na Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (BEPE-FAPESP).

José Francisco Miguel Henriques Bairrão, Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

José Francisco Miguel Henriques Bairrão earned bachelor’s degrees in Psychology and Philosophy from the University of São Paulo (FFLCH and IP). He received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from the State University of Campinas (IFCH) and holds the title of Associate Professor at the University of São Paulo (FFCLRP). He is currently a researcher and professor of Social Psychology in the Department of Psychology at the Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences, and Letters of the University of São Paulo. He coordinates the Ethnopsychology Laboratory at this institution, where he supervises and conducts research guided by an interest in maintaining the connection between epistemological reflection (Epistemology of Psychology, Philosophy of Psychoanalysis) and empirical research (Psychology of Culture, Psychology of Religion), as well as being open to interdisciplinary arguments and contributions.

References

BAIRRÃO, J. F. M. H & AFFONSO, P. H. D. The border of the other: study on an expanded conception of corporeity in psychoanalysis. Critical hermeneutics, v. 8, n. 2, p. 451-476, 2024.

BALIBAR, É. Le Structuralisme: une destitution du sujet? Revue de métaphysique et de morale, v. 45, n. 1, p. 5-22, 2005

CANGUILHEM, G. La Nouvelle connaissance de la vie: le concept et la vie. In: _____. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences concernant les vivants et la vie. Paris: Vrin, 2002, p. 335-364.

CANGUILHEM, G. Mort de l’homme ou épuisement du cogito? In: _____. Oeuvres Complètes (tome V). Paris: Vrin, 2018, p. 189-214.

DESCOLA, P. As duas naturezas de Lévi-Strauss. Sociologia & Antropologia, v. 1, n. 2, p. 35-51, 2011.

DURKHEIM, É. Les Règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: PUF, 2007.

FOUCAULT, M. Les Mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.

FOUCAULT, M. La Vie: l’expérience et la science. In: _____. Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988. Paris: Gallimard, 2001, p. 1582-1595.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Tristes Tropiques. Paris: Plon, 1955.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Anthropologie Structurale. Paris: Plon, 1958.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. La Pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon, 1962.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Le Cru et le cuit Paris: Plon, 1964.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Du Miel aux cendres. Paris: Plon, 1966.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Éditions EHESS, 1967.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. L’Origine des manières de table. Paris: Plon, 1968.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Le Totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF, 1969.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. L’Homme nu. Paris: Plon, 1971.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Le Regard éloigné. Paris: Plon, 1983.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. La Potière jalouse. Paris: Plon, 1985.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Histoire de lynx. Paris: Plon, 1991.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Anthropologie Structurale deux. Paris: Plon, 1996.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. (2010). Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss. In MAUSS, M. Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 2010, p. IX-LII.

MANIGLIER, P. Des Us et des signes. Lévi-Strauss: philosophie pratique. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, v. 45, n. 1, p. 89-108, 2005.

THOUARD, D. Entre Concept et sujet: quelques réflexions sur l’histoire de la philosophie française. In: CASSOU-NOGUÈS, P. & GILLOT, P. (éd). Le Concept, le sujet et la science: Cavaillès, Canguilhem, Foucault. Paris: Vrin, 2009, p. 219-236.