Between the singular and the plural: notes on art, autonomy and politics

Main Article Content

João Pedro Cachopo

Abstract

This article brings together a set of notes that seek to debate the relationship between art and politics taking the ambivalence of the notion of autonomy as a point of departure (I). This ambivalence is due the fact that autonomy refers to art either in the singular or in the plural. So these notes cover various issues including the difference and complementarity between aesthetic and art (II); the relationship between artistic practice, aesthetic experience and art criticism (III); the interaction of the arts in the light of the postmodern debate (IV); the diversity of interartistic practices (V). When all is said and done, the article suggests that the relationship between the arts is both a condition and a stimulus of the politics of the arts, the singularity of their common purpose notwithstanding (VI).

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

João Pedro Cachopo, Centro de Estudos de Sociologia e Estética Musical da Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL)

João Pedro Cachopo studied Musicology and Philosophy in Lisbon (Universidade Nova de Lisboa), Paris (Université Paris 8) and Berlin (Universität Potsdam e Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin). He received a PhD in Contemporary Philosophy from the Universidade Nova de Lisboa in 2011 with a dissertation on Adorno’s aesthetics, recently published under the title "Verdade e Enigma. Ensaio sobre o pensamento estético de Adorno" ["Truth and Enigma. Essay on Adorno’s Aesthetics"]. His research interests include the fields of contemporary philosophy (aesthetics and politics), musicology, and literature. He currently develops a post-doctoral project at the Centro de Estudos de Sociologia e Estética Musical (Universidade Nova de Lisboa), in collaboration with the Centre for Contemporary Performance Arts (University of Durham), which seeks to discuss the interplay of different arts and media both aesthetically and politically. With a special focus on opera, the project is intended to develop a new approach to what may be called – drawing on recent work by Rancière, as well as on Benjamin and Adorno – the politics of opera. It builds on the hypothesis that an inquiry into the relation of opera to other arts (especially cinema, literature, and visual arts) may shed light on the politics of opera and, ultimately, contribute to a reconfiguration of the modes of experience and critical appropriation of the genre. In this context, he co-organized the international conference “Opera and Cinema: The Politics of an Encounter” (2012), edited an issue of Textos & Pretextos on opera and literature (Summer 2013), and coordinates since 2012 the seminary “Aesthetics and Politics across the Arts”. He teaches at FCSH-UNL since 2012 and at ISEIT since 2013. His work has been published in journals such as Artefilosofia, Colóquio/Letras, Música Hodie, Parrhesia: a Journal of Critical Philosophy, Theoria & Praxis: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Thought, Viso – Cadernos de Estética Aplicada, among others. He translated into Portuguese works by Bernard Aspe, Georges Didi-Huberman and Jacques Rancière. He is also member of the collective Unipop, and co-editor of Imprópria.